Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Barack Obama promised during the presidential campaign that he wanted to reduce abortions and said as much in a statement yesterday in association with the anniversary of Roe. Today, however, he betrayed that promise by forcing taxpayers to fund groups promoting and performing abortions overseas.
In an executive order, the president officially scrapped the Mexico City Policy that protected taxpayers from involvement in overseas abortions for eight years. Now, Obama will send hundreds of millions of dollars to groups that aggressively promote abortions on a worldwide scale.
Obama was slated to overturn on Thursday the protections President Bush put back in place following the Clinton administration, but Obama decided to wait.
He hoped his decision today to force taxpayers to fund foreign abortions will somehow make him seem less radical because he decided to wait until after the pro-life movement mourned the thirty-sixth anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
The executive order will make non-governmental groups that do abortions in other nations or lobby pro-life countries to overturn their abortion limits eligible for public funds.
Setting aside the fact that Americans are being forced to pay for something that many deem nothing less than murder, it is odd that he would choose to do so at a time when the economy is in turmoil. Not only will our money be funding for abortions overseas, but it is money that could be used here to help women with alternatives. You see, the government is willing to help women to kill their babies, but does not want to fund positive alternatives.
See more at Life News: President Barack Obama Forces Taxpayers to Fund, Promote Worldwide Abortions
Related: Pro-Life Advocates: Obama Has Already Betrayed Promise to Reduce Abortions
EDIT: Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Martin Luther King is being interviewed by Raymond Arroyo on World Over Live. If you miss it tonight, catch it at other times listed here. She is talking about the genocide of minorities through abortion. She herself was almost the victim of abortion, and later....nearly became a victim of Planned Parenthood. Interesting background she is giving. And, she was born on January 22 - the anniversary of Roe v. Wade.
Te Deum Laudamus! Home
The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
1 Comments:
Mica Mica Parva Stella
Miror quae nam sis tambella
(sorry if I didn't spell it right)
If you want to help give Obama the "boot",
do you know anyone who is a wealthy Catholic attorney willing to
file an action against Obama for allegedly not being a "natural born citizen" and allegedly not qualfying for the office he holds?
I started wondering about his birth certificate when I heard that he voted "present" (neither yes or no) to not give birth certificates to real live babies who were born real and live after a botched abortion attempt to kill them.
I've been wondering about Obama's birth certificate ever since.
Attempts have been made in various courts to get his long form birth certificate, with no luck so far.
Courts have claimed that voters have no jurisdiction or no legal standing.
No one has filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you know of a wealthy Catholic attorney (it is expensive to file legal actions), that would be a place to start; I would humbly suggest.
I'm not an attorney, but I've read a lot, being very motivated because I was so shocked about President Barack Hussein Obama's attitude about abortion when I learned about it last June.
President Barack Hussein Obama's campaign showed a "Certification of Live Birth" on the internet, which is just a short form birth certificate. Hawaii gives birth certificates to people born in foreign countries, and they alter them and seal the original.
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov
Have you ever heard of that song, "40 ways to leave your lover"?
Hawaii has 41 statutes about birth certificates and most of them are for altering, and sealing, and issuing new ones after the facts have been changed!
Also, they have a Hawaii Rule of evidence 803 that is NOT the same as Federal Rules of Evidence 803; so right there, you have a cause of action:
Case Cite
1998
United States v De Water,
The District Court did not abuse its discretion in applying Federal Rules of Evidence rather than Hawaii Health Department rules.
What I am hoping for is that some wealthy attorney who can afford to file, and who has the time, will file against U.S. Congress for fraud in a fiduciary capacity for certifying the electoral college votes without seeing Obama's original long form birth certificate, and sue former Vice President Dick Cheney for fraud for failing to ask for any objections to the electoral college vote, and sue Supreme Court Justice John G. Roberts for fraud for doing the 2nd swearing in of Obama in private rather than in public, and without any Republicans present.
28 USCS, Chapter 91, United States Claims Court, Section 1491 (a)(1) The United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim against the United States founded either upon the CONSTITUTION or any Act of Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States.
The Court of Federal Claims is Article I Court of limited jurisdiction created by Congress as a forum where PRIVATE PARITES CAN SUE GOVERNMENT, where claims would otherwise be barred by sovereign immunity.
Congress created Court of Federal Claims to afford individuals a forum to bring specific claims against government.
The test for evaluating sufficiency of civil rights complaints is whether the complaint alleges sufficient facts pleaded so as to provide defendants with enough information so they may frame an answer; the plaintiffs are not required to provide proof of claims, nor proffer all available evidence.
I hope someone reads this who is a wealthy attorney
with incentive to try to un-seat President Barack Hussein Obama.
Post a Comment