Showing posts with label Theology of the Body. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theology of the Body. Show all posts

Saturday, August 13, 2011

"Our Lady of the Theology of the Body"...???

Well intentioned things can just get carried a little too far......


Source (under the "more info")

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=188075991257823



For interesting news items I don't have time to blog on, check out my Twitter Feed: @TeDeumBlog

Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Friday, August 12, 2011

Bishop Jean Laffitte weighs in on "Theology of the Body"


Bishop Jean Laffitte, who is the Secretary for the Pontifical Council for the Family was interviewed by EWTN News at CNA on certain aspects of, "Theology of the Body". You may recall that there was a very public and strong debate taking place in the wake of Christopher West's appearance on Nightline in 2009 and that continued into 2010. 

I am only going to provide a snippet from the opening of the lead-in article, but if you have a serious interest in this topic, read the full interview slowly, and carefully

From CNA/EWTN News:

.- Bishop Jean Laffitte is warning against focusing too intently on the sexual aspect of Blessed John Paul II's Theology of the Body, which he says runs the risk of eliminating the depth and “mystery” involved in human and divine love.

“The problem is, if you focus only on sexuality you can't develop beyond that, and you don't see that this beauty is a gift given by the Creator but in a much wider context,” said Bishop Laffitte, secretary of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for the Family, in an interview with CNA. 

In an Aug. 3 interview, Bishop Laffitte weighed in on the current debate on how best to interpret the late pontiff's teachings, saying it is essential to first understand God's design in creating man and woman.

Pope John Paul II's teachings on human love and sexuality – a collection of five years’ worth of his Wednesday audiences from 1979 to 1984 – is widely seen as unprecedented in the history of the Church.
I'm sure this will bring a new round of discussions.  


For interesting news items I don't have time to blog on, check out my Twitter Feed: @TeDeumBlog

Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Interesting Catholic Reads for February 10, 2011

Tomorrow is the Memorial of Our Lady of Lourdes. This photo was taken following the 7:00pm Latin Novus Ordo Mass at Assumption Grotto on February 11, 2008, which was the 150th anniversary.  The priests, deacon and transitional deacon all knelt before the statue of Our Lady of Lourdes and led the Holy Rosary.

I am unaware if there will be a special Mass at 7:00pm Friday for Our Lady of Lourdes with all available priests.  Typically, the Friday evening Mass is in the extraordinary form (1962 Missal) and the Rosary follows all weekday Masses.  I plan on going in the morning.

I've been unable to post on a daily basis.  I will often "Tweet" things I want to pass along to readers (watch the feed in my sidebar).  Since someone else has already covered the news or topic, it's a matter of drawing it to your attention.

A few blogposts and news items...
Louis Belanger blogged on the Medjugorje commission, Pope Benedict, and the light of truth in his post: Medjugorje: De veritate nunquam satis (concerning truth one can never say enough).  Louis also placed this thought into the Vatican Information Service blogpost: Catholic Universities: Lead Students to Light of the World.

On a similar topic, Donal Foley, author of Understanding Medjugorje, takes a close look at the critique recently offered by Denis Nolan on the 2006 book (link to Nolan's article is embedded in Foley's response).

Fr. Angelo over at MaryVictrix, offers a thought provoking post enttitled, Alternate States of Unreality, which does a deep dive into the Occult, Magic & Mysticism, Harry Potter, and Theology of the Body.

Father Z fields a question: Is it a sin not to pray every day?

I heard about this on Catholic radio, but Tom Peters, the American Papist blogs on it  here: Chicago Catholic Hospital offers to help women halt abortions.  There are women who begin the process and then change their minds. 

A new website has been offered for the cause of Pope John Paul II: http://www.karol-wojtyla.org/
LifeSiteNews is reporting that a seventh Planned Parenthood clinic has been caught in a sex-trafficking snare being laid out by LiveActionFilms.org.  In the meanwhile, Lila Rose who heads that up, blogs on the Top Six Planned Parenthood Deceptions.

Pope Benedict XVI says every Catholic is called to encourage vocations (CNA/EWTN News)

Catholic blogger Chelsea Zimmerman, herself paralyzed, has written a very good piece entitled: Refusing to Suffer Is Refusing to Live.  I recommend checking in on her blog, Reflections of a Paralytic


For interesting news items I don't have time to blog on, check out my Twitter Feed: @TeDeumBlog

Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Monday, December 13, 2010

ToB: Dr. Alice von Hildebrand, a Bleeding Placenta, and "Saying Hard Sayings"


Dr. Alice von Hildebrand speaks at Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Wyandotte, MI
during the 2007 Call to Holiness Conference.

At the end of November this year, Dr. Alice von Hildebrand released an article called, Revelation and Curiosity at Catholic News Agency . I decided to wait to draw attention to it since it came out as "Thanksgiving weekend" concluded.  It is preceded by this:


Editor's note: Dr. Alice von Hildebrand adds to the debate with Christopher West over Theology of the Body. She addresses his words that Mary ejected a bloody placenta after she gave birth to Jesus


This isn't just about the Here is one excerpt from her short piece which I recommend reading in full:
This "harmless" and understandable curiosity rampant today (after all, is one not entitled to ask questions?) can have another serious consequence. Revelation being silent on certain issues, the impatient questioner, eager to find an answer at all cost, might, unwittingly, be tempted to become "creative" and will fall from the supernatural to the purely natural.

Father Angelo Geiger at Mary Victrix snowballed off of Dr. von Hildebrand's piece on December 7th in a blogpost entitled, "Saying Hard Sayings".  Fr. Angelo starts out...

Alice von Hildebrand’s recent article entitled “Revelation and Curiosity” goes a long way to place the debate over the true meaning of modesty in the larger context of philosophical and theological thought. She highlights the basic distinction between supernature (God and the order of grace) and nature. The precise character of that distinction has always been essential to theological discourse, and the relation between grace and nature has often been the subject of unfettered speculation, to the detriment of the faith. (See, for example, Pelagianism and Jansenism.)


Father's piece goes even deeper, taking a closer look at faith and reason, apologetics, theology, and catechetics first.  He then comes back to discuss chastity, the claim about Mary's bleeding placenta, and the Perpetual Virginity of Mary in greater detail. 

While the comment box is open here, I suggest leaving comments at the respective sources.  There is already a bit of dialogue at Fr. Angelo's blogpost. 


For interesting news items I don't have time to blog on, check out my Twitter Feed: @TeDeumBlog

Te Deum Laudamus! Home
The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.
Editor's note: Dr. Alice von Hildebrand adds to the debate with Christopher West over Theology of the Body. She addresses his words that Mary ejected a bloody placenta after she gave birth to Jesus

Monday, October 11, 2010

Disappointing post-sabbatical comments by Christopher West


The "West Wars", for lack of a better expression, continues to hit the blogosphere.  I still have not had time to make my compendium of ToB essays and blogposts from both sides of the aisle.  It may not be pleasant to hear the word "wars" or "sides", but there is definitely a chasm which is visible to this observer. My personal opinion is that there could not be this much noise, if there were not some things in need of closer attention. 

WAVE OF ENTHUSIASM and "GOOD FRUITS" ARGUMENTS
Many things today ride on a wave of enthusiasm or popularity.  When other Catholics, many in reputable positions, call into question some aspect of the thing at the center of that enthusiasm, the defenders will almost always use the "good fruits" argument while passing on the substantive points raised by those concerned.

In the discernment of spirits there is a hierarchy that is traveled before advancing to analysis of fruits.  The thing itself must be examined. A mushroom found in a field may smell good, have a good taste, and even have nutritious value.  What needs to be discerned is whether it is of a poisonous variety.  Those "good fruits" do not eliminate the fact that a particular mushroom can cause anything from mild sickness to death.  

That analysis needs to include a careful look at both good and bad fruits, as well.  "Bad fruits" are being reported. Unfortunately, enthusiasm for a thing often masks bad fruits.  An example often cited in trying to make this point is that of a glass filled with water (a good thing) and a very tiny amount of arsenic added (a bad thing), is still a poisonous drink.  Some might say spill it out; others would say, just run it through a filter. 

In this battle we have over Theology of the Body here in the US, most critics I have read are saying it needs to be filtered.  I have seen repeatedly, most critics acknowledging the good West has done in some areas.  Filtering his brand of Theology of the Body does not in any way mean an end to young couples taking chastity or Humanae Vitae seriously.

DISAPPOINTING WORDS FROM WEST - TRANSCRIBED
Overnight, another posting has appeared - this time by Fr. Angelo Mary Geiger - a Franciscan of the Immaculate .  He has transcribed an audio recording of Christopher West which follows his sabbatical.  I found what West said, disappointing. As one who feels there are things which warrant a closer look and dialogue, his response - even without reading Father's commentary - does not give me much hope that the time away will yield the fruit necessary for a reduction in noise level on the web.  If anything, I think it is only escalating frustration that, even if he is listening, he isn't necessarily hearing those concerns. 

He claims to be taking seriously the feedback from critics and making changes.  But, are they meaningful changes which comprehend the concerns being raised?  You decide. 

The recording took place on September 18, 2010 at Pikes Peak Place in Colorado Springs: “Interview with Christopher West and Mike Mangione” (Fill These Hearts):  Bishop Sheridan Presents (Diocese of Colorado Springs)

I must admit that when I heard the portion of the audio clip, since isolated by Fr. Angelo Mary in his transcription, I was taken aback by some things said by West.

You can get the audio, the transcription, and Father's commentary in the link below.

Go read:  Christopher West’s Translation of John Paul II’s Body Language by Fr. Angelo at Mary Victrix.

Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Academic Dean, ToB Instructor echoes concerns about West on concupiscence

I only have a brief moment to push you over to a new article just released at Catholic News Agency...

Academic dean echoes criticism of West’s treatment of concupiscence

I plan on making a post in the near future which compiles links to essays and articles from both critics and defenders of the Christopher West brand of Theology of the Body as it currently stands.

EDIT:  Do read the article at CNA, but then go to a piece upon which the CNA article is written at the blog of Dr. David Delaney.  There is a very rich and productive dialogue taking place in the combox, mostly amongst people with theology backgrounds who are bringing some great insight into the discussion.  It has been a dignified discussion, at least through the 30 or so comments I just saw.  St. Thomas and St. Bonaventure anybody? Go read: Concupiscence in the West-Schindler Debate at Cosmos-Liturgy-Sex

I would like to note the following about the author from the CNA article...

Delaney, the academic dean of the Mexican American Catholic College, has a doctorate in systematic theology from the Catholic University of America. He teaches the Theology of the Body at the undergraduate and graduate levels and presents it popularly at parishes. He is currently broadcasting a series on Guadalupe Radio and Catholic television in San Antonio



Te Deum Laudamus! Home
The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

The "West Wars": It would be merciful for the Holy See to enter...



I have been following the "West Wars" for some time without saying much.  In my humble opinion, it would be merciful for the Holy See to step in.  It would be a relief for someone from "outside" to facilitate dialogue amongst the "warring" parties on the "inside", or to simply solicit the primary arguments from the key defenders and critics and examine them, ultimately providing clarification on certain points.  This could truly be fruitful for courses and catechetics on "theology of the body" around the world.  I think there are some things that need to be carefully looked at by a team of theologians  who have no prior involvement, or stake in it.

Visible magma is only a fraction of what lies beneath!
The public war over Christopher West's interpretation and presentation of Pope John Paul II's, "theology of the body" (ToB) is escalating, with each side digging in their heals.  Note, that what you see on the surface publicly is nothing in contrast to what has likely been bubbling below the surface for many years.  Before a volcano blows, there is considerable pressure below the surface.  The magma we see flowing out is only a fraction of what is contained deeper down. This war on the interpretation and presentation of theology of the body is not about the now infamous Nightline invertivew.  That was merely a catalyst which set into motion the eruption, and subsequent lava flow.  Rather, what I am seeing is a deep set of philisophical and theological differences of opinion by well-respected people who uphold the Church's teaching on things like contraception. 

Good fruits alone?
What I have also observed in the "West Wars" is something common in other spheres.  People who are supportive feel West is being "attacked".  And, because there are good fruits cited by couples, such as mentioned previously - ending the use of contraception, they seem to feel that critiquing his "brand" of ToB is a threat to this.  Fruits, however, are often lower down the ladder of discernment.  An objective look at content and mode of delivery comes well before examining "good fruits".  Case in point: A baby is a good fruit because God does not create bad fruit.  But, if the baby came into existence through rape, then we have an example of a good fruit which stemmed from a bad act. 

I have seen some serious questions raised that I feel have been talked around, such as the one involving the Easter Candle as a phallic symbol. I have not seen any of West's supporters yet actually respond to the quote attributed to Fr. Hugo Rahner as explained by Dawn here (see related footnotes on page 30 of the 3rd revision of her thesis)....emphasis mine in bold:

Hugo Rahner’s words, although written several years before the revision of the liturgy, neatly summarize the theology behind the Consilium’s revision: “What we witness here [in the candle immersion] is a symbol of Christ crucified giving to the water the illuminating power of the Spirit[,] and those who insist on seeing a phallic symbol in the candle appear to be completely oblivious to what not only the Roman, but all other liturgies have to declare on this particular point, of what, in point of fact, they declare with considerable emphasis. It is that the baptismal font is immaculatus uterus, and that, like Mary, the Church bears her children solely by the power of the Spirit."
[Note: on April 23, 2011, Sr. Lorraine, who serves as an editor on some of Christopher West's works, has provided an indepth look at the subject above in a post entitled: The Wood in the Water -- What Does the Easter Candle Symbolize?.  She goes deeper into Rahner's works and concludes the Paschal candle should not be looked upon as a "phallic symbol"]
Ordinary Catholics in the pew who have read some books or have been to some conferences using West's material can offer little else but testimonials in this debate.  Such testimonials, while helpful in some ways, are never a true and full measure of whether something is fully in harmony with the teachings or the mind of the Church. 

Then there are the bishops.  While Cardinal Justin Rigali and Bishop Kevin Rhoades have been publicly supportive of Christopher West's interpretation and approach this past year, it seems reasonable to wonder whether there is similar support across the board among all of our bishops when there is disunity at every other level.  If reputable theologians, philosophers, professors, priests, and a chunk of the laity are divided, and with all but two bishops silent on the matter thus far, what are we to think?  Let's not jump to conclusions: Their silence does not tell us whether they are supportive, critical, or unaware.  

I, for one, do not think it would be prudent for bishops to be opposing one another publicly.  It becomes even more confusing for the faithful, and causes them to side with this bishop or that one, when the bishops should speak with one voice - one that is in harmony with truth.  Further, polling bishops is not a good measure of truth.  We can only pray that our shepherds are looking personally into the concerns raised, and if they cannot agree with one another, then invite the Holy See to examine the matter and offer the necessary clarifications to end their private differences and the public debate among the flock. More than likely, the only signs we might see would be dioceses dropping the West content and switching to another "brand".

We should pray that the bishops look past the current wave of enthusiasm and look at the concerns.


Prime Example of Disunity: The Sodomy Issue
We ought to assume good intentions on both sides.  However, there cannot possibly be two versions of any one truth.  North cannot be south, and up cannot be down.  Truth isn't dynamic and moving about over time, but static and timeless.  It can take time to arrive at truth, and some end up on detours along the way.  For example, I am perplexed at what seems like different understandings of what theologians and professors feel constitutes sodomy in this debate . I would like to raise a basic question:  At what point does foreplay end, if not when the man is adequately prepared for coitus?    Similarly, I find that not all theologians seem to agree on whether ejaculation is required to make it an act of sodomy or not.

This issue is one primary reason I think it would be merciful for the Holy See to get involved.  All sides seem to be citing various Church documents, and St. Thomas Aquinas to make their argument.  The "theology of the body" debate has exposed issues like this which can, and out to  be, clarified and taught with consistency by all theologians, confessors, apologists, catechists and chastity speakers around the world.  Right now, the one consistent thing I've seen is inconsistency on the matter, and by a good many well respected people. 

Now, I leave you with the latest set of public exchanges.  The comboxes are lively as we would expect.

Dr. Janet E. Smith critiques Dawn Eden's thesis;
and, Dawn Eden critiques Dr. Smith's critique

The comboxes in these linked articles are lively as we would expect. There are interesting debates there and more may be learned there.



Catholic News Agency hosted the master's thesis of Dawn Eden which was a critique (here is the lead-in article, with the thesis at the bottom in PDF form). 

On September 30, 2010, Dr. Janet E. Smith published a critique of the thesis at Catholic Exchange

There is further commentary on Dr. Smith's piece at Catholic News Agency...

On October 1, 2010, Dawn Eden's response was published at Catholic News Agency.

Note:  It is very late, and I had intended to put a number of links in this post for reference.  I will try to come back and edit these in when I have time.

I am also continuing my temporary shut down of the combox so that I am not tied to the computer looking to moderate them. 

Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Friday, August 27, 2010

Dawn Eden: Avoiding the Errors of 'Sexualism'



Dawn Eden, who is now beginning her doctorate in Moral Theology, has released a column at Headline Bistro which continues the discussion on Christopher West's interpretation and presentation of Pope John Paul II's, "Theology of the Body".  This follows her master's thesis which is now hosted for free download at Catholic News Agency in it's third revision, which adds further clarification.

Go read:



Te Deum Laudamus! Home
The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Dawn Eden's Master's Thesis on Theology of the Body now at CNA

The thesis written by Dawn Eden which critiques Christopher West is now available for free via Catholic News Agency (llink is provided in the body of her post below), which is hosting the 80+ page document on it's website. 

This is very good news because the research offered by Dawn is worthy of time and attention.  I myself have read the revised edition which preceded this version now on CNA.  I felt she did a very good job of detailing some of the main problems, and she does so in a way that is not condescending.  I am hoping to write my own review later.   

Sadly, as with anyone who has raised concerns over the Christopher West interpretation and presentation of Pope John Paul II's writings on the subject, Dawn has come under criticism. It's important to note that the version uploaded at CNA is revised and addresses some of these. 

I have been watching this intense debate for the past year and I've noticed that no matter how charitably someone critiques aspects of West's interpretation and presentation, they are thought to be "attacking" him. The matter has divided many good and faithful Catholics.  I believe that the reason the cork blew so forcefully is that a segment of Catholics has had issues with it for a very long time and dialogue has been suppressed by the wave of enthusiasm. 

Pearls are created by friction.  That which Pope John Paul II wrote will be better understood over time.  The way  it is interpreted and presented will grow over time, and I believe these critiques which are coming out are a necessary part of polishing.  Therefore, harsh rhetoric on either side is unnecessary. 

I strongly advise young people, and parents, to read this thesis and understand the problems.  I will be making a post which compiles arguments on both sides (hopefully, chronologically).  As you read more of these, you will begin to see the themes of concern. 

I believe people need to make their own bishops aware of their concerns - charitably.

Dawn writes (my emphases in bold):

My master's thesis critiquing Christopher West now available for free from Catholic News Agency


Following Cardinal Justin Rigali's homily at the Theology of the Body urging that the "rich content" of John Paul II's Wednesday catecheses "be mined and proclaimed," I have decided to make my master's thesis, "Towards a 'Climate of Chastity': Bringing Catechesis on the Theology of the Body into the Hermeneutic of Continuity," available to all, free of charge. The thesis critiques the presentation of John Paul II's theology of the body that has been popularized by Christopher West and the Theology of the Body Institute, which was founded to promote West's presentation.


Catholic News Agency has generously agreed to host the thesis on its Web site so that the paper may be downloaded for free. The link for downloading the thesis may be found at the end of CNA's interview with me. That article also has space for comments, if you would like to add your own thoughts to the discussion.


The version of my thesis available from CNA is a brand new revision that includes a new preface in which I answer some criticisms that have arisen since I first made the work available. In addition, since some West fans have claimed I do not give his teachings sufficient context, I have included additional examples from his work.


I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who has encouraged me in my research, as well as everyone who has shown their support by donating to support my doctoral studies. (As I have previously noted, my goal is to become a professor of moral theology at a small Catholic college.) If you have benefited from my thesis and would like to support my studies, you may click here to donate.


Thanks also to those who have written me with any kind of feedback on my thesis, whether supportive or not. Submitting my work for public discussion has been a great learning experience. If you would like to contact me, I invite you to do so via my feedback form. Also, I am grateful for any and all "knee-mail"--that is, prayer. I am sending it heaven-ward daily for everyone who reads my thesis, and for everyone involved in the TOB discussion.

Here is one excerpt from the CNA article where the thesis can be found:

Eden’s thesis—which gained public attention in June when she published her official defense on her blog—has sparked controversy among some Catholics, as it critically examines popular speaker Christopher West’s presentation of John Paul II’s teachings.

Among the assertions made by West that she faulted was his claim that the Church’s liturgy “is modeled on the union of spouses,” which he supports by saying the Easter Candle is “truly” intended to be a phallic symbol. Eden countered this by citing documentation from the Consilium—the body of experts charged with revising the liturgy following Vatican II—showing that theologians appointed by the Magisterium had rejected the phallic interpretation of the candle
And, with good reason. You'll have to read the thesis to learn more.

For those who do not know Dawn Eden, you can find more here from her website

Te Deum Laudamus! Home
The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Monday, August 9, 2010

Catholic professor discusses the feminine body and "spousal love"

Via Catholic News Agency, the article begins (links have been added by me)...

Crestview Hills, Ky., Aug 7, 2010 / 08:02 am (CNA).- Writing for this week's edition of the Thomas More College journal, Catholic professor Mary Shivanandan addressed the topic of feminine beauty, explaining that a woman's physical and spiritual attributes find their fullest expression in “spousal love,” whether in motherhood or consecrated celibacy.


On Aug. 5, The Thomas More College of Liberal Arts released its latest journal issue, Second Spring: an International Journal of Faith and Culture. This recent edition is dedicated to exploring the Theology of the Body from several perspectives.

In her article titled, “The Spousal Nature of Feminine Beauty in John Paul II,” Mary Shivanandan – a professor of Theology at the John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and the Family at the Catholic University of America – explores the theme of the purpose of a woman's beauty and where it finds its fullest expression
This is an area that I believe is developing with regards to what is commonly referred to as, "Theology of the Body".  I think the next few years are going to yield some fruitful discussion about this topic in some areas that have been neglected.  This is one of them. 

“Feminine bodily beauty!” Shivanandan began in her article. “Is this not a topic more suitable to a fashion magazine than a serious journal? What does it have to do with theology?”


“But John Paul II takes feminine beauty very seriously,” the professor underscored.


“Right away,” she added, “we have a perspective on the feminine body that is not characteristic of our culture, which either favors the thin straight silhouette of the fashion model or the dress open and showing curves to the navel.”


In modern society, woman “is presented either without sexual attributes or as a sex object,” the professor lamented. “How is it even possible to address a culture that treats the feminine body in this way?”


I might add, that this is why, in modern society, we have such a rise in eating disorders and people spending loads of money on elective surgery for reasons of vanity.

However, “John Paul II does not hesitate to rise to the challenge,” she wrote.


“When John Paul II links the visible bodily aspect of a woman with its power of perennial attraction 'in strict accordance with motherhood,' he may seem to be limiting the often wondrous visible beauty of woman to one dimension.”


Yet, “the mystery of femininity manifests and reveals itself in its full depth through motherhood,” Shivanandan said, quoting the late Pontiff.

“This mystery, as he explains in his Apostolic Letter Mulieris Dignitatem, involves 'a special openness to the new person' on the part of woman through which she discovers her own identity precisely as woman.”


In this gift of self through the openness of bringing new life into the world, a woman not only realizes her identity as female, but reaches the fullest expression of what feminine beauty is, explained Shivanandan


“Beauty, feminine beauty, which, as John Paul II says, is in strict accordance with motherhood, is both a source and fruit of spousal love lived sacramentally in the family,” she noted. “From it radiates the beauty of the civilization of love.”


“It is the great challenge of our time to recover this sense of feminine beauty as intrinsically
spousal,” Shivanandon wrote.
She now mentions "spousal love" in another context - a vocation open to some women which is probably unknown to many Catholics.

In addition to a woman expressing her beauty as a gift of self through spousal love in marriage, the professor added, in “the consecrated virgin the spousal form is also present but expressed in a different way, as signifying the priority of personhood over bodily sexual attraction.”


“Espoused to the Lord, she points to the eschaton (heavenly reality) where there is no giving in human marriage. Thus the woman has to be affirmed in her role as person, oriented to self-gift, spouse and mother in a correct order.”
What exactly is a consecrated virgin?  From the code of canon law:
Can. 604 §1 The order of virgins is also to be added to these forms of consecrated life. Through their pledge to follow Christ more closely, virgins are consecrated to God, mystically espoused to Christ and dedicated to the service of the Church, when the diocesan Bishop consecrates them according to the approved liturgical rite.

You can read more at the website of the United States Association for Consecrated Virgins, and I especially recommend reading through the FAQs, and for the greatest level of detail, the information packet.

The article concludes:

Shivinandan reflected that this “way of approaching feminine beauty is almost entirely foreign to our culture, which isolates feminine bodily beauty as a thing in itself, using it to sell products or titillate the senses.”


Pope John Paul II, however, “finds the search for what he calls 'integral beauty' or 'purity free from stain' in the bridegroom’s search in the Song of Songs,” the professor observed.


“He notes that the Song of Songs refers to the bride as 'a garden closed,' a 'fountain sealed,' because, in the Pope’s words, she is 'the master of her own mystery.'”


“The authentic gift of the woman, which is essential to her personal dignity, is revealed in the gift of self as spouse and mother.”



Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!
Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

New critique of Christopher West's ToB teachings available

Now available is an updated version of a piece I have yet to read, but have since ordered.  It is a master's thesis by author/journalist Dawn Eden entitled: "Towards a 'Climate of Chastity': Bringing Catechesis on the Theology of the Body into the Hermeneutic of Continuity." 

It is the work of  Dawn Eden who obtained a MA in Theology from the Dominican House of Studies (a solid source).  Dawn, who graduated in May, is now working toward's a doctorate in moral theology at Catholic University of America. Dawn has led an interesting life and God's grace is truly visible in where she is now (I don't know how to update Wiki's, but someone may want to update it with her MA in Theology and a note about her master's thesis).

Dawn explains the thesis:

The 80-page, heavily footnoted thesis is a critique of Christopher West's presentation that reveals the substance behind recent criticisms of his approach, contains new information (including how the fathers of Vatican II condemned the Jungian phallic interpretation of the Easter Candle ritual), and makes positive suggestions for improving instruction on the TOB.


She is offering this thesis in PDF form to anyone donating $10 to go toward's her schooling.  Priests, among others, qualify for a free copy, and "starving students" for the cost of a pizza (LOL).  Please support Dawn

West is currently on a 6-month sabbatical. He has great talents and much to offer.  But, I think his works and lectures need to comprehend the issues that have been raised. Please keep him in your prayers.

Go to Dawn Eden's post to read much more about this thesis, and to order a copy: My revised master's thesis is now available.

Veil-tip to Anna Arco on Twitter for drawing attention to this late June post by Dawn.


Te Deum Laudamus! Home
The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Christopher West takes a sabbatical

From LSN:

Christopher West Takes Sabbatical to Reflect on Approach
By Patrick B. Craine


EXTON, Pennsylvania, April 12, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Renowned Catholic writer and speaker Christopher West has taken a six-month sabbatical to consider his approach in presenting the Church's teaching on sexuality.


Seeking “personal and professional renewal,” West will cease teaching and has cancelled his speaking engagements for the period. The announcement came from the Theology of the Body Institute, where West serves as a research fellow and faculty member, and indicates that the decision was mutual between West and the Institute's board of directors.


The time away is intended to allow West “to reflect more deeply on fraternal and spiritual guidance he has received in order to continue developing his methodology and praxis as it relates to the promulgation of the Theology of the Body.” The announcement also indicates that West must “attend to family needs.”


While no direct reference is made to it, the sabbatical follows a controversy over an alleged lack of modesty in West's approach that began last spring....[continue reading West at LSN]
Does "anything go" as long as it is open to life?

There are certain issues that I see defended by online apologists, often citing West.  In particular, is an issue pertaining to married couples and I fall in line with Fr. Albert Lauer, now deceased.  He was the founder of Presentation Ministries - a very strong catechetical foundation still working hard today, and with an online presence.  People often say that just about anything goes as long as the marital act ends in a way that is open to life.  Taking the position of Fr. Lauer, and based on concupiscence and Original Sin, I disagree with these justifications.  I would encourage you to bookmark Presentation Ministries homepage and use it as a watering hole.  It has got some great catechesis there that falls in line with the understandings held by many Grotto goers. 

Please note that I will not be posting comments with explicit references because there are young readers.  What pertains to married couples above should be read and prayed about. 



Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!

Friday, July 25, 2008

This day 40 years ago: Humanae Vitae - July 25, 1968



It was this day, 40 years ago, that Pope Paul VI gave to the Church one of the most prophetic encyclicals - one that would be dissented against by lay people and cleric alike. The Encyclical Letter, Humanae Vitae - on Human Life is far better understood today, and in increasing numbers followed, as people become better informed.

It was the document that clarified contraception. Why? In a nutshell, God is the author of life and when two people, joined in Sacramental Marriage engage in the marital act, it is not only unitive for them, but is procreative and must be open to life.

This document is now online at the Vatican's website and it takes just one evening to read (I was about 3/4 through in less than an hour and will probably finish it tonight). Here are some excerpts with emphasis mine in bold, added emphasis in blue, and comments in red.


Union and Procreation

12. This particular doctrine, often expounded by the magisterium of the Church, is based on the inseparable connection, established by God, which man on his own initiative may not break, between the unitive significance and the procreative significance which are both inherent to the marriage act.

The reason is that the fundamental nature of the marriage act, while uniting husband and wife in the closest intimacy, also renders them capable of generating new life—and this as a result of laws written into the actual nature of man and of woman. And if each of these essential qualities, the unitive and the procreative, is preserved, the use of marriage fully retains its sense of true mutual love and its ordination to the supreme responsibility of parenthood to which man is called. We believe that our contemporaries are particularly capable of seeing that this teaching is in harmony with human reason.


I found this interesting...


Faithfulness to God's Design

13. Men rightly observe that a conjugal act imposed on one's partner without regard to his or her condition or personal and reasonable wishes in the matter, is no true act of love, and therefore offends the moral order in its particular application to the intimate relationship of husband and wife. If they further reflect, they must also recognize that an act of mutual love which impairs the capacity to transmit life which God the Creator, through specific laws, has built into it, frustrates His design which constitutes the norm of marriage, and contradicts the will of the Author of life. Hence to use this divine gift while depriving it, even if only partially, of its meaning and purpose, is equally repugnant to the nature of man and of woman, and is consequently in opposition to the plan of God and His holy will. But to experience the gift of married love while respecting the laws of conception is to acknowledge that one is not the master of the sources of life but rather the minister of the design established by the Creator. Just as man does not have unlimited dominion over his body in general, so also, and with more particular reason, he has no such dominion over his specifically sexual faculties, for these are concerned by their very nature with the generation of life, of which God is the source. "Human life is sacred—all men must recognize that fact," Our predecessor Pope John XXIII recalled. "From its very inception it reveals the creating hand of God." (13)



Many rebelled against it, and I know of women who tell me that word circulated about which confessors they could go to who would not condemn contraception. But, at what cost was all this dissent done? When I say it was prophetic, here is just one paragraph from the encyclical:

Consequences of Artificial Methods

17. Responsible men can become more deeply convinced of the truth of the doctrine laid down by the Church on this issue if they reflect on the consequences of methods and plans for artificial birth control. Let them first consider how easily this course of action could open wide the way for marital infidelity and a general lowering of moral standards [we often wonder just how low those moral standards can go - I don't even think Pope Paul could fully comprehend them all back then]. Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law. Another effect that gives cause for alarm is that a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection.

Finally, careful consideration should be given to the danger of this power passing into the hands of those public authorities who care little for the precepts of the moral law. Who will blame a government which in its attempt to resolve the problems affecting an entire country resorts to the same measures as are regarded as lawful by married people in the solution of a particular family difficulty? Who will prevent public authorities from favoring those contraceptive methods which they consider more effective? Should they regard this as necessary, they may even impose their use on everyone. It could well happen, therefore, that when people, either individually or in family or social life, experience the inherent difficulties of the divine law and are determined to avoid them, they may give into the hands of public authorities the power to intervene in the most personal and intimate responsibility of husband and wife [thus hindering the actions of God, the author of life].

Contraception has cost millions of babies their lives. Many do not know that the pill can actually be an abortifacient. We are now fighting against things like human cloning and embryonic stem cell research which sacrifices one human being for others. Women have become mere objects of sex, and for many women, so have men. It is mere recreation in many societies today, without any due care for what is pleasing or displeasing to God. So many have sex outside of marriage, and in extra marital affiars without any thought that they are violating the most basic laws laid down in the Ten Commandments. They are now treated as nothing more than the Ten Suggestions.

More on Humanae Vitae:









Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!