A bishop talks about encountering liturgical abuse while vacationing

An auxiliary bishop from the Archdiocese of Indianapolis, Bishop Christopher J. Coyne is a blogger. He decided to share an experience that may seem all too famliar - liturgical abuse. For some, it is not what they encounter on vacation, but what is happening at their own parish. The bishop was intending to go to Confession, as well, but decided against it.  He writes:

I do know one thing. I certainly wasn't going to ask him to hear my Confession. If he changed the words of the Institution Narrative, there's no telling what he might do with the words of Absolution...

On the one hand, it's sad to read.  On the other  hand, Catholics all across America experience this kind of thing every Sunday and they don't think the bishops see it.  The Mass doesn't belong to the priest, nor to the community.  It belongs to the Church and she is the one who decides how it is best celebrated.    

I"ve been to some parishes here in the Archdiocese of Detroit where it seems it would be fruitful to review Redemptionis Sacramentum (On certain matters to be observed or to be avoided regarding the Most Holy Eucharist).  It was written in the 90's to curb experimentation with the liturgy which ran amok.  I think some priests have become accustomed to doing things a certain way, and may have lost sight of what was in that document.   I've seen concelebrants without a chasuble, glass pitchers, the gloria omitted, along with some other things, and children taking up canned goods for Offertory (it's nice, but it's not what the Offertory is about - the food collection could happen in the vestibules each week). 

One priest from another country - a very devout man, who was learning the Latin Rite, was doing everything perfectly in the beginning.  He was reading the black and doing the red.  He went on the other side of town to help a friend for a month while that pastor was on vacation, and he came back committing all kinds of illicit acts.  I did not hold it against him, nor was I upset with him because he didn't know any better.   Among the things he "learned" on the other side of town, was to fracture the unconsecrated host upon saying, "...He blessed the bread and broke it...".   I won't discuss the other things he was doing.  I later provided him to with a copy of RS and just encouraged him to read it since he was new to the rite, without saying anything else.  Perhaps he did, or didn't read it.  I just know that when I went back once or twice a month, these things were gradually being sanitized out.  I suspect the pastor, who does not do those things, saw him as well, and may have spoken to him. He does a pretty stand up job now, from the few times I've seen him.

It's always important to approach such things with a certain amount of tact - you cannot judge the motive behind why a priest does these things.  Consider that some middle-aged priests, who in the 90's may have been young associates, may not have been given much exposure to RS when it first came out. We can't think in terms of how accessible information is today and apply it to the early 90's or prior.  Today, with the web, we all know what is happening - sometimes before the thing even happens.  That's why I think bishops ought to ask their priests to read from RS a little each day and make sure they are in harmony with it.  Some will blow it off, and some will work to make things right.  With the right kind of encouragement from a bishop, those who may not be as aware as we think they should be, could respond humbly.   You also don't want to make a laundry list of each and every problem.  Tackle the biggest problem first and talk to the priest about it - privately and nicely.  See how he responds.  If he's not receptive to correcting the problem, then write to the bishop.  They can't address what they don't know. 

My experience with younger priests is that they do know about RS.  Sometimes, the problem they run into is resistance at the parish level with the pastor.  This can be sticky for them and they have to choose their battles wisely.  We need these young men to become pastors, so they can follow the mind of the Church on liturgical matters.  I'm of the opinion that unless there is something which makes the Mass invalid, it is best to lay low and not make a fuss.  Pick one issue and make a suggestion.  If that goes well and the pastor is open,  try another suggestion after some time passes.  With such a shortage of priests, it won't take long for a new priest to become a pastor.  But, if he doesn't choose his battles wisely, he could be labeled in ways that will only delay getting that parish.  Of course, you never compromise on serious moral issues or on a matter that results in an invalid Mass.  Those things must be dealt with.


Fr. Z has some observations about the bishop's post and comments flowing.

---

For interesting news items I don't have time to blog on, check out my Twitter Feed: @TeDeumBlog

Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!

Note: The recommended links below are automatically generated by the tool, so they are not necessarily related content.

When charity becomes uncharitable: A commentary by Msgr. Ignacio Barreiro Carámbula - Rome Office of HLI

This needs no further commentary. Thanks to Life Site News for carrying it, and to Fr. K for alerting me to it.

EDIT: After reading the commentary and giving it some thought, I would like to state that I felt there should have been a Catholic funeral because we cannot know to what depth and scope he may have repented, even after he was unable to speak. However, I did not feel his funeral should have been public. That having been said, I believe much of what Msgr. Ignacio has to say is worthy of pondering. Further, I don't want to suggest that Cardinal O'Malley was uncharitable by the heading of this post. Rather, my thought was that in general, charity for some can be carried to a point that it becomes uncharitable for others, or even for those whom charity is supposedly directed. Mercy can become merciless, if it does not put at the forefront the salvation of one's soul.

Truth, Charity and Mercy: On Satisfying the Requirements for a Catholic Funeral

Commentary by Msgr. Ignacio Barreiro Carámbula, Doctor of Dogmatic Theology and head of the Rome office of Human Life International

Author's Note: The Catholic Church has taught on many occasions on the important duties of Catholic political leaders. A recent event in Boston makes it necessary to reflect again on those teachings. "John Paul II, continuing the constant teaching of the Church, has reiterated many times that those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a 'grave and clear obligation to oppose' any law that attacks human life. For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them." (Doctrinal Note on some questions regarding The Participation of Catholic in Political, CDF, n. 4.)

September 8, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - True love consists in presenting the saving truths that the Lord has entrusted to His Church with clarity and precision, without any concessions to the spirit of the world. This duty is not only incumbent to the Hierarchy, but to all Catholics and in particular to the persons who have a position of social and political leadership; they have to manifest these teachings and, more importantly, their lives have to be lead in coherence with those teachings.

There is no doubt that example and coherence of life are much more eloquent than a thousand words. This applies especially to the example of those who have a position of public authority. Such as these cannot be selective in the way that they adhere to the teachings of the Church: all teachings are important and they have an inner coherence that is necessary to respect.

At the same time, the teachings of the Church with regards to life and family have a central position because if the right to life from conception through natural death, and the protection the origin of life which is the family, are not respected, all the other rights that a human person might have become illusory.

If a Catholic is engaged in politics, the Church has a right and a duty to request coherence from this person. If, regrettably, this Catholic refuses to be coherent, the Church has the right and the duty to refuse him the reception of the Holy Eucharist as it is established in Canon 915: "Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion."

Archbishop Raymond Burke, commenting on this canon points out that, "The application [of the canon], therefore, is more necessary than ever, lest the faithful, led astray by the strong cultural trends of relativism, be deceived concerning the supreme good of the Holy Eucharist and the gravity of supporting publicly the commission of intrinsically evil acts. Catholics in public office bear an especially heavy burden of responsibility to uphold the moral law in the exercise of their office which is exercised for the common good, especially the good of the innocent and defenceless. When they fail, they lead others, Catholics and non-Catholics alike, to be deceived regarding the evils of procured abortion and other attacks on innocent and defenceless human life, on the integrity of human procreation, and on the family." (The Discipline Regarding the Denial of Holy Communion to Those Obstinately Persevering in Manifest Grave Sin, Periodica, Vol. 96 (2007), pp 57-58.)

In the same way that publicly incoherent Catholics might be denied communion, these persons can also be denied ecclesiastical funeral rites. The Code of Canon Law establishes, Can. "1184 §1. Unless they gave some signs of repentance before death, the following must be deprived of ecclesiastical funerals: 3/ other manifest sinners who cannot be granted ecclesiastical funerals without public scandal of the faithful."

The Code establishes two cumulative requirements to permit the ecclesiastical funeral of public sinners: some signs of repentance and the avoidance of public scandal of the faithful.

We are informed by the press that the person who received the recent funeral in Boston gave some signs of repentance; but those signs were not specific at all with regards to the many grave and public violations that he committed against the teachings of the Church. Even if the signs of repentance would have been judged sufficient by competent local ecclesiastical authority, the problem of the scandal remains because the ordinary of the place where the funeral was officiated could not have been ignorant that the funeral was going to be turned into a celebration of the life of that particular person.

Here we should also remember the norm of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal that establishes: "382. At the Funeral Mass there should, as a rule, be a short homily, but never a eulogy of any kind." There is ample public evidence provided by the press that this norm was not respected in a recent Boston funeral and that fact is in itself a reasonable source of scandal.

We should also remember that Catholics that are scandalized by this recent funeral in Boston have a right to express their complaints to competent Church authorities in accordance with the instruction "Redemptionis Sacramentum" of the Congregation for Divine Worship of March 25, 2004, that establishes: "184. Any Catholic, whether Priest or Deacon or lay member of Christ's faithful, has the right to lodge a complaint regarding a liturgical abuse to the diocesan Bishop or the competent Ordinary equivalent to him in law, or to the Apostolic See on account of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff. It is fitting, however, insofar as possible, that the report or complaint be submitted first to the diocesan Bishop. This is naturally to be done in truth and charity."

To uphold the teachings of the Church with regards to the responsibility of Catholic political leaders is a two-fold exercise of mercy. First, it is for the good of the soul of the politician. A politician that is acting contrary to fundamental teachings of the Church in his public life is risking his eternal salvation. So to warn this person in due canonical fashion and then, if he persists, to apply to him canonical sanctions will help him to repent and change his life. The Church, sharing the infinite love of Jesus Christ, does not want that any of its members should perish and be deprived of eternal life.

Second, it is an act of mercy towards society, because any thing that tends to confuse or blur the Christian message of salvation damages the ability of the Church to fulfil her saving mission. As a consequence in this particular case it would have been an act of mercy towards all Catholics and to many other persons of good will who suffered scandal by this recent funeral to deny it.

In conclusion, the Church should examine with attention the recent funeral in Boston and determine in an official and authoritative way if corrective action is necessary to avoid the furtherance of this type of scandal in the future.
Original source article at Life Site News: Truth, Charity and Mercy: On Satisfying the Requirements for a Catholic Funeral

If you decide to write to the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments (CDWDS)

His Eminence
Antonio Cardinal Cañizares Llovera
Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship
and Discipline of the Sacraments
Palazzo delle Congregazioni
P.zza Pio XII00120
VATICAN CITY

Scroll down here for Fr. Z's practical advice for use when writing to the Holy See. Please note that some of the names have changed. Above, I have the correct name for the new Prefect. His guidelines apply well for writing to any member of the hierarchy, including your own bishop.


Te Deum Laudamus! Home

The obedient are not held captive by Holy Mother Church; it is the disobedient who are held captive by the world!